Secure Flight is a passenger pre-Airport security program for flights in the United States, managed by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). It is a risk-based system that matches passenger information against watch lists maintained by the federal government. Results are used to communicate with about high or low risk passengers.
The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (IRTPA) of 2004 required the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to assume from aircraft operators the function of conducting pre-flight comparisons of airline passenger information to federal government watch lists for international and domestic flights by 2005. The Secure Flight program was introduced in August 2007, which proposed requiring airlines to send passenger information to the TSA for comparison against watch lists. The TSA would respond with instructions to either screen a passenger normally, use enhanced screening, or denial into the sterile area. They hoped this new system would reduce the number of people accidentally being matched to a watch list.
The Secure Flight Final Rule was issued in October 2008 and officially began the transfer of watch list matching to the TSA. Secure Flight began implementation with select domestic aircraft operators at the beginning of 2009 and completed implementation for all domestic and international airlines in December 2010.
In 2010, the program transitioned to a risk-based system in response to the attempted attack of Northwest Airlines Flight 253 in December 2009. This allowed the system to identify people not in watch lists. In 2011, the TSA began to use the entire Terrorist Screening Database instead of being limited to the No Fly List or Selectee List.
In 2013, the program was further expanded to search private databases for information like past travel with the intention of identifying low risk people for TSA PreCheck.
Secure Flight has many similarities with CAPPS and the No Fly List, and therefore raises the same validated concerns about civil liberties and due process. Specifically, civil libertarians argue that under the Secure Flight program, there are insufficient redress mechanisms for innocent citizens on watch lists. Additionally, the content and quantity of the watch lists has fallen under scrutiny.
|
|